![]() ID 929.) On J– the day after the parties agreed to settle Hipple’s STD claim – Hipple filed the instant Motion seeking leave to amend his Complaint to add both a new claim and a new party. (See Motion to Amend Compl., ECF #19 at 7, Pg. (See Opinion and Order, ECF #17.) On July 21, 2014, the parties settled Hipple’s claim for STD benefits, thereby resolving – in its entirety – Hipple’s Complaint. (See Complaint, ECF #1.) On June 13, 2014, entered an Opinion and Order (1) vacating Matrix’s final determination denying STD benefits to Hipple and (2) remanding the matter to Matrix for an additional review of Hipple’s claim to determine whether he otherwise qualified for STD benefits. In his Complaint, Hipple alleged that Matrix wrongly denied his claim for short-term disability (“STD”) benefits on the ground that Hipple was not a participant in the Plan on the date of his disability. (“Denso”), and the Denso Health & Welfare Plan (the “Plan”) (collectively, the “Defendants). (“Matrix”), Denso International America, Inc. _/ ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF #19) On March 8, 2013, Plaintiff Paul Hipple (“Hipple”) filed the instant action against Matrix Absence Management, Inc. 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION PAUL HIPPLE, Plaintiff, Case No.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |